
Zync: Leading an AI/video SaaS from interface to infrastructure
I joined Zync as a frontend developer and gradually took ownership across backend systems and cloud infrastructure, helping shape five products across the stack.
Video products often work well in a demo, then meet expensive rendering, uneven demand, retries, and slow failure diagnosis in production. I help teams trace those costs and delays through the processing path and make focused improvements.
The useful starting point is a real production path: what starts a job, where it waits, what it computes, how it fails, and how the output reaches a user. That makes the next engineering change specific and measurable.
Relevant experience at Zync
90%lower cloud compute cost
I led queue-based rendering work across Zync’s AI/video stack. The resulting system supported 200 renders per day, with peaks around 500.
Read the Zync case studyThe first deliverable can be a technical assessment or a bounded production change. We choose the shape after looking at the system, the available measurements, and the cost of the problem.
Review the processing path, timings, failure modes, and cost signals to establish what needs to change.
Implement a targeted change to the queue, worker, media processing, or cloud setup as the evidence directs.
Compare cost, throughput, and reliability against the baseline and leave the team with a clearer operating picture.
At Zync, my role grew from front-end development into backend, AI/video workflows, and cloud operations across five product areas. See how product delivery, rendering, and reliability connected in one platform.

I joined Zync as a frontend developer and gradually took ownership across backend systems and cloud infrastructure, helping shape five products across the stack.
Send the current processing path, the volume you handle, and the cost or reliability issue you see. We can decide whether an assessment or a focused change is the right first step.